And while the Harpers may deserve whatever is plaguing their house, that doesn’t make it any less terrifying to see the sins of their past come back as a string of dangerous traps, sprung by the filmmakers with clockwork precision. Randall and Graye have made a movie largely about a privileged family with a lot to hide. Still, it’s rare to see a horror film so devoted to intricate plot mechanics and so concerned with driving to a satisfying payoff. The kidnapping is eventually explained too, in an ending that ties everything together too neatly. The second half of “I See You” digs into the possible paranormal activity, via one whopper of a plot twist - best left as a surprise. Making matters worse, a series of mysterious incidents around the Harper home raises the possibility they’re being haunted. Meanwhile, Jackie’s embittered, cuckolded cop husband Greg (Jon Tenney) is investigating a child abduction that’s putting their upscale suburban community on edge. Helen Hunt plays psychologist Jackie Harper, who’s trying to hold her family together even as her son Connor (Judah Lewis) keeps lashing out at her about her recent affair. Director Adam Randall and screenwriter Devon Graye have delivered the kind of sly nail-biter that could use a little more open space on the calendar to build up buzz so it can get noticed by fans of imaginative, original horror. And everyone is happyIt’s too bad that a suspense film as smart and unpredictable as “I See You” is being released so late in the year, at a time when most movie buffs are preoccupied with Oscar contenders. Great story and trade makes perfect sense! 3 for 1. But, at the same time, letting go of that Sodalite blue daytona would have been very hard. I am very familiar with your story where you and I have discussed it on another forum. Plus, it has put me in a good position with this dealer, and they've been willing to help with anything else we've asked for since then. The AD initially only offered to include one white and one black face Daytona, so it took a bit of pushing for the two whites. I definitely left some cash value on the table, but I still think it was worth it. I was able to get two white Daytonas for my brother and me, and a bit of a deal on a Yacht Master for my dad. I sent the watch out for service through my local boutique, and when it returned I made a trade that made my brother, father and me happy. I finally thought it may be a good idea to look into trading this one watch for a couple pieces so we both had something. So, my brother and I would borrow it and pass it back and forth over the years. Long story, but in the end, he's not really a watch guy. My dad ended up with this white gold Daytona with the Sodalite dial back around 2001. I made a trade last year that I'm sure many here would frown upon. And the result is that each watch he owns is special to him and puts a smile on his face. So, the OP seems to favor quality, as he sees it, versus quantity. Cities Counties New York City Public Authorities Schools Special Districts State - Executive State. Facing a recent affair, great strain is put on the family that slowly gnaws away at Jackie's grip on reality. But if you intend to actually wear the watches you love, getting wrist time on such a collection can be a challenge. When a 10-year-old boy goes missing, lead investigator Greg Harper (Tenney) struggles to balance the pressure of the investigation and troubles with his wife, Jackie (Hunt). If you’re an investor/trader that may be reasonable. I read a thread on this forum recently that suggested over 15% of forum members own 25 or more watches. The monetary evaluation is the consensus of market opinions and valuations, but not reflective of what matters most to every buyer and seller. From that perspective the message I got from this thread is “own what you desire the most, and cull what you find no longer appeals to you”. Namely that watches in the marketplace may have a listed value, but personal preferences skew the value based upon what matters to each party. My point isn’t for me to judge the OP’s decision or valuation of the watches involved, but rather to recognize the more interesting conclusion he arrived at. He clearly didn’t want to do that, and the overall result was exactly what he wanted. In response to the many comments suggesting that the watches he traded were valued higher than the value of the watch he bought, the OP explained the transaction and from his perspective it was a fair trade, or perhaps $10k less if he would have sold each watch separately. As such I say Bravo to the OP, who clearly is pleased with the result. As I read the initial post it seemed a statement of preference, not a financial transaction designed for profit. The OP stated that he traded 4 watches for 1, showing pictures of each.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |